An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Fernandez v. California, 571 U.S. 292 (2014), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that explored the limits of Georgia v. Randolph, a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. Fernandez, however, held that when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonable purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Fernandez v. California, 571 U.S. 292 (2014), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that explored the limits of Georgia v. Randolph, a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. Fernandez, however, held that when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonable purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 39436370 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6126 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1016879257 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Fernandez v. California, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Thomas (en)
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-02-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2014 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:docket
  • 12 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Walter Fernandez, Petitioner v. California (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • When a resident who objects to the search of his dwelling is removed for objectively reasonable purposes , the remaining resident may validly consent to search. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Fernandez v. California (en)
dbp:majority
  • Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • 292 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 571 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Fernandez v. California, 571 U.S. 292 (2014), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that explored the limits of Georgia v. Randolph, a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. Fernandez, however, held that when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonable purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Fernandez v. California (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Walter Fernandez, Petitioner v. California (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License