dbo:abstract
|
- Elgin v. Department of Treasury, 567 U.S. 1 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court ruled that the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) gives exclusive jurisdiction for claims under the Act to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Additionally, the Court held that the Act bars federal district courts from ruling on matters related to the act including adverse employment actions of the federal departments, and allows the Merit Systems Protection Board to hear constitutional arguments for wrongful employee severance and adverse employment actions. It was a 6–3 decision, with the majority opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas. The case greatly limited the recourse of federal employees to the courts for adverse employment practices, allowing such recourse only to a few, specific courts as aforementioned. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 6416 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-02-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Elgin v. Department of Treasury, (en)
|
dbp:cornell
| |
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Michael B. Elgin, et al., Petitioners v. Department of the Treasury, et al. (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- The CSRA gives exclusive jurisdiction to suits rising under the act to the MSPB, with appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and further appeals to the Supreme Court. Federal District Courts cannot rule on issues regarding the act or on adverse employment actions of the federal departments. The MSPB can hear constitutional arguments for adverse employment actions. (en)
|
dbp:italicTitle
| |
dbp:joindissent
| |
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
|
- Civil Service Reform Act of 1978; ; (en)
|
dbp:litigants
|
- Elgin v. Department of Treasury (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:otherSource
| |
dbp:otherUrl
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Elgin v. Department of Treasury, 567 U.S. 1 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court ruled that the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) gives exclusive jurisdiction for claims under the Act to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Additionally, the Court held that the Act bars federal district courts from ruling on matters related to the act including adverse employment actions of the federal departments, and allows the Merit Systems Protection Board to hear constitutional arguments for wrongful employee severance and adverse employment actions. It was a 6–3 decision, with the majority opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas. The case greatly limited the recourse of federal employees to the courts for adverse employment practices, allowing such r (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Elgin v. Department of Treasury (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Michael B. Elgin, et al., Petitioners v. Department of the Treasury, et al. (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |