An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Elgin v. Department of Treasury, 567 U.S. 1 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court ruled that the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) gives exclusive jurisdiction for claims under the Act to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Additionally, the Court held that the Act bars federal district courts from ruling on matters related to the act including adverse employment actions of the federal departments, and allows the Merit Systems Protection Board to hear constitutional arguments for wrongful employee severance and adverse employment actions. It was a 6–3 decision, with the majority opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas. The case greatly limited the recourse of federal employees to the courts for adverse employment practices, allowing such r

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Elgin v. Department of Treasury, 567 U.S. 1 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court ruled that the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) gives exclusive jurisdiction for claims under the Act to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Additionally, the Court held that the Act bars federal district courts from ruling on matters related to the act including adverse employment actions of the federal departments, and allows the Merit Systems Protection Board to hear constitutional arguments for wrongful employee severance and adverse employment actions. It was a 6–3 decision, with the majority opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas. The case greatly limited the recourse of federal employees to the courts for adverse employment practices, allowing such recourse only to a few, specific courts as aforementioned. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 36682714 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6416 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1067749697 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-02-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2012 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Elgin v. Department of Treasury, (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2012 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Alito (en)
dbp:fullname
  • Michael B. Elgin, et al., Petitioners v. Department of the Treasury, et al. (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • The CSRA gives exclusive jurisdiction to suits rising under the act to the MSPB, with appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and further appeals to the Supreme Court. Federal District Courts cannot rule on issues regarding the act or on adverse employment actions of the federal departments. The MSPB can hear constitutional arguments for adverse employment actions. (en)
dbp:italicTitle
  • force (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Ginsburg, Kagan (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • Civil Service Reform Act of 1978; ; (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Elgin v. Department of Treasury (en)
dbp:majority
  • Thomas (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 567 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Elgin v. Department of Treasury, 567 U.S. 1 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court ruled that the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) gives exclusive jurisdiction for claims under the Act to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Additionally, the Court held that the Act bars federal district courts from ruling on matters related to the act including adverse employment actions of the federal departments, and allows the Merit Systems Protection Board to hear constitutional arguments for wrongful employee severance and adverse employment actions. It was a 6–3 decision, with the majority opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas. The case greatly limited the recourse of federal employees to the courts for adverse employment practices, allowing such r (en)
rdfs:label
  • Elgin v. Department of Treasury (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Michael B. Elgin, et al., Petitioners v. Department of the Treasury, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License