An Entity of Type: Abstraction100002137, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Dial-A-Mattress Franchise Corp. v. Page, 880 F.2d 675 (2d Cir. 1989), is a case that was tried in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which dealt with the issue of whether a plaintiff's telephone number, which translates into a generic term, is entitled to judicial protection when a second comer tries to use a confusingly similar number.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Dial-A-Mattress Franchise Corp. v. Page, 880 F.2d 675 (2d Cir. 1989), is a case that was tried in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which dealt with the issue of whether a plaintiff's telephone number, which translates into a generic term, is entitled to judicial protection when a second comer tries to use a confusingly similar number. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 33506424 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 8179 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1088197539 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-06-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1989 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • 17280.0
dbp:citations
  • 17280.0
dbp:court
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:courtseal
  • Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.svg (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-07-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1989 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • "Dial-A-Mattress Franchise Corporation v. Anthony Page, dba Easy Associates, Page Industries, and Easy Bed, and Easy Bed, Incorporated" (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Although one company’s use of a generic term does not preclude competitors to use the term for their own business purposes, it does not mean competitors may use the term to deceive the public with a confusingly similar use of that term. (en)
dbp:judges
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • "Dial-A-Mattress Franchise v. Anthony Page" (en)
dbp:prior
  • Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Dial-A-Mattress Franchise Corp. v. Page, 880 F.2d 675 (2d Cir. 1989), is a case that was tried in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which dealt with the issue of whether a plaintiff's telephone number, which translates into a generic term, is entitled to judicial protection when a second comer tries to use a confusingly similar number. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Dial-A-Mattress Franchise Corp. v. Anthony Page (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License