An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 382 (1813), involved a forfeiture statute that Congress passed with a condition. The 1809 trade prohibition against Great Britain was to be reinstated in 1810 unless the President declared, by proclamation, that Great Britain was no longer violating the neutrality of the United States. The defendant argued unsuccessfully that such a conditional law unconstitutionally delegated congressional legislative authority to the President. The Court unequivocally upheld "reviving the act...either expressly or conditionally, as their judgment should direct."

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 382 (1813), involved a forfeiture statute that Congress passed with a condition. The 1809 trade prohibition against Great Britain was to be reinstated in 1810 unless the President declared, by proclamation, that Great Britain was no longer violating the neutrality of the United States. The defendant argued unsuccessfully that such a conditional law unconstitutionally delegated congressional legislative authority to the President. The Court unequivocally upheld "reviving the act...either expressly or conditionally, as their judgment should direct." (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 26595784 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2160 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1067751435 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:case
  • Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States, (en)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1813 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States (en)
dbp:holding
  • Congress may revive a law by conditioning its revival on certain inaction by the President. Such is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Johnson (en)
dbp:openjurist
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 7 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 382 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 11 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 382 (1813), involved a forfeiture statute that Congress passed with a condition. The 1809 trade prohibition against Great Britain was to be reinstated in 1810 unless the President declared, by proclamation, that Great Britain was no longer violating the neutrality of the United States. The defendant argued unsuccessfully that such a conditional law unconstitutionally delegated congressional legislative authority to the President. The Court unequivocally upheld "reviving the act...either expressly or conditionally, as their judgment should direct." (en)
rdfs:label
  • Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License