An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court created a two-part test for the application of the state action immunity doctrine that it had previously developed in Parker v. Brown.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court created a two-part test for the application of the state action immunity doctrine that it had previously developed in Parker v. Brown. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 23317053 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 5949 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 941816623 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-01-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1980 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • California Retail Liquor Dealers Association v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-03-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1980 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • California's wine pricing system constitutes resale price maintenance in violation of the Sherman Act, since the wine producer holds the power to prevent price competition by dictating the prices charged by wholesalers. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Powell (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Brennan (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 259200.0
dbp:uspage
  • 97 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 445 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court created a two-part test for the application of the state action immunity doctrine that it had previously developed in Parker v. Brown. (en)
rdfs:label
  • California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License