An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co., 480 U.S. 572 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case addressing the question of whether United States Forest Service regulations, federal land use statutes and regulations, or the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, preempt the California Coastal Commission's imposition of a permit requirement on operation of an unpatented mining claim in a national forest. The court ruled that even if federal land is not included in the Coastal Zone Management Act's interpretation of "coastal zone," the act does not automatically preempt all state regulation of activities on federal lands.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co., 480 U.S. 572 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case addressing the question of whether United States Forest Service regulations, federal land use statutes and regulations, or the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, preempt the California Coastal Commission's imposition of a permit requirement on operation of an unpatented mining claim in a national forest. The court ruled that even if federal land is not included in the Coastal Zone Management Act's interpretation of "coastal zone," the act does not automatically preempt all state regulation of activities on federal lands. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 51355424 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 9489 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1063367686 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-12-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1986 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co., (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • Powell (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-03-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1987 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • California Coastal Commission v. Granite Rock Co. (en)
dbp:holding
  • A state may require an unpatented mining claim in a national forest within the coastal zone to be reviewed by the state's coastal agency. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence/dissent
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • White (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Rehnquist, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, and Stevens (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co. (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • O'Connor (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 572 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 480 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co., 480 U.S. 572 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case addressing the question of whether United States Forest Service regulations, federal land use statutes and regulations, or the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, preempt the California Coastal Commission's imposition of a permit requirement on operation of an unpatented mining claim in a national forest. The court ruled that even if federal land is not included in the Coastal Zone Management Act's interpretation of "coastal zone," the act does not automatically preempt all state regulation of activities on federal lands. (en)
rdfs:label
  • California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • California Coastal Commissionv.Granite Rock Co. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License