About: Birch v Cropper

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Birch v Cropper (1889) 14 App Cas 525 is a UK company law case concerning shares. It illustrates the principle of exhaustion, that the rights attached to a share in an article would be presumed exhaustive, although one should construe the nature of a share with a starting presumption of equality. The principle is now subject to the advice given by Lord Hoffmann in Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd and ICS Ltd v West Bromwich BS.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Birch v Cropper (1889) 14 App Cas 525 is a UK company law case concerning shares. It illustrates the principle of exhaustion, that the rights attached to a share in an article would be presumed exhaustive, although one should construe the nature of a share with a starting presumption of equality. The principle is now subject to the advice given by Lord Hoffmann in Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd and ICS Ltd v West Bromwich BS. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID	32517007 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	2715 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1082944444 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Andrews_v_Gas_Meter_Co dbr:House_of_Lords dbr:Liquidation dbr:Edward_Macnaghten,_Baron_Macnaghten dbr:Judicial_functions_of_the_House_of_Lords dbr:Attorney_General_of_Belize_v_Belize_Telecom_Ltd dbr:Investors_Compensation_Scheme_Ltd_v_West_Bromwich_Building_Society dbc:House_of_Lords_cases dbc:United_Kingdom_company_case_law dbc:1889_in_British_law dbc:1889_in_case_law dbr:Canal dbr:Share_(finance) dbr:Leonard_Hoffmann,_Baron_Hoffmann dbr:Presumption dbr:UK_company_law
dbp:citations	14 (xsd:integer)
dbp:court	dbr:House_of_Lords
dbp:keywords	Share (en)
dbp:name	Birch v Cropper (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Clist_shares dbt:Infobox_court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:House_of_Lords_cases dbc:United_Kingdom_company_case_law dbc:1889_in_British_law dbc:1889_in_case_law
gold:hypernym	dbr:Case
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Birch v Cropper (1889) 14 App Cas 525 is a UK company law case concerning shares. It illustrates the principle of exhaustion, that the rights attached to a share in an article would be presumed exhaustive, although one should construe the nature of a share with a starting presumption of equality. The principle is now subject to the advice given by Lord Hoffmann in Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd and ICS Ltd v West Bromwich BS. (en)
rdfs:label	Birch v Cropper (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Birch v Cropper wikidata:Birch v Cropper https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4Yjmx
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Birch_v_Cropper?oldid=1082944444&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Birch_v_Cropper
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Birch_v_Cropper