An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Badgerow v. Walters, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether and, if so, when federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction to confirm or vacate arbitration awards under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The Court held that the "look through" approach established by the Court's decision in "does not apply to requests to confirm or vacate arbitral awards under Sections 9 and 10 of the FAA."

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Badgerow v. Walters, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether and, if so, when federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction to confirm or vacate arbitration awards under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The Court held that the "look through" approach established by the Court's decision in "does not apply to requests to confirm or vacate arbitral awards under Sections 9 and 10 of the FAA." (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 69496066 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 5721 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1100999052 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2021 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Badgerow v. Walters, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-03-31 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2022 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Breyer (en)
dbp:docket
  • 20 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Denise A. Badgerow v. Greg Walters, et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • The “look-through” approach to determining federal jurisdiction, whereby a federal court assesses whether there is a jurisdictional basis to decide a Federal Arbitration Act Section 4 petition to compel arbitration by means of examining the parties’ underlying dispute, does not apply to requests to confirm or vacate arbitral awards under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Badgerow v. Walters (en)
dbp:majority
  • Kagan (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:uspage
  • ___ (en)
dbp:usvol
  • 596 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Badgerow v. Walters, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether and, if so, when federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction to confirm or vacate arbitration awards under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The Court held that the "look through" approach established by the Court's decision in "does not apply to requests to confirm or vacate arbitral awards under Sections 9 and 10 of the FAA." (en)
rdfs:label
  • Badgerow v. Walters (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Denise A. Badgerow v. Greg Walters, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License