About: Astrue v. Capato

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Astrue v. Capato, 566 U.S. 541 (2012), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that children conceived after a parent's death are not entitled to Social Security Survivors benefits if the laws in the state that the parent's will was signed in forbid it. The case was a unanimous decision. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5756879/18/capato-v-commissioner-social-security/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/800567/astrue-v-capato/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20110104074 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-159.pdf http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/22/opinion/la-ed-survivors-benefits-astrue-capato-20120322%7Cwork=Los http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/21/justice/scotus-posthumous-conception-ruling/%7Cpublisher=CNN%7Caccess-date=23 http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-supreme-court-in-vitro-20120521,0,2325938.story%7Cwork=Los https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=6577565239241615023 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/566/541/ https://www.npr.org/2012/03/19/148935151/justices-weigh-ivf-technology-against-1939-law%7Cpublisher=NPR%7Caccess-date=24 https://www.npr.org/2012/05/21/153224630/court-no-benefits-for-kids-conceived-after-dad-died%7Cpublisher=NPR%7Caccess-date=24 https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/us/children-not-entitled-to-dead-fathers-benefits-justices-rule.html%7Cwork=The https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/11-159 https://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/05/21/high-court-denies-benefits-to-parent-of-child-born-through-ivf/%7Cpublisher=The
dbo:wikiPageID	35908157 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	7319 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1063283783 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_566 dbr:US_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Third_Circuit dbr:ODAR dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Sperm_bank dbr:Sterility_(physiology) dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Will_and_testament dbr:D.N.J. dbr:3d_Cir. dbr:Esophageal_cancer dbc:Social_Security_lawsuits dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Social_Security_Administration dbr:In_vitro_fertilization dbr:Certiorari dbr:Social_Security_(United_States) dbr:Chevron_U._S._A._Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc. dbr:F.3d dbr:Unanimous dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-03-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2012 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Astrue v. Capato, (en)
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/800567/astrue-v-capato/
dbp:decidedate	0001-05-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2012 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket	11 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Petitioner v. Karen K. Capato, on Behalf of B. N. C., et al. (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=6577565239241615023
dbp:holding	The SSA’s reading is better attuned to the statute’s text and its design to benefit primarily those supported by the deceased wage earner in his or her lifetime. Moreover, even if the SSA’s longstanding interpretation is not the only reasonable one, it is at least a permissible construction entitled to deference under Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.. Third Circuit reversed and remanded. (en)
dbp:joinmajority	unanimous (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/566/541/
dbp:litigants	Astrue v. Capato (en)
dbp:majority	Ginsburg (en)
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-159.pdf
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/11-159
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	25920.0
dbp:uspage	541 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	566 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_web dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Refbegin dbt:Refend dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Social_Security_lawsuits
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Astrue v. Capato, 566 U.S. 541 (2012), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that children conceived after a parent's death are not entitled to Social Security Survivors benefits if the laws in the state that the parent's will was signed in forbid it. The case was a unanimous decision. (en)
rdfs:label	Astrue v. Capato (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Astrue v. Capato yago-res:Astrue v. Capato wikidata:Astrue v. Capato https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4Svyi
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Astrue_v._Capato?oldid=1063283783&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Astrue_v._Capato
foaf:name	(en) Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Petitioner v. Karen K. Capato, on Behalf of B. N. C., et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:566_U.S._541 dbr:Astrue_v_Capato dbr:Karen_Capato
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Posthumous_birth dbr:566_U.S._541 dbr:List_of_Social_Security_lawsuits dbr:Astrue_v_Capato dbr:Social_Security_(United_States) dbr:Oncofertility dbr:Karen_Capato
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Astrue_v._Capato