An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that absent exigency, the warrantless search of personal luggage merely because it was located in an automobile lawfully stopped by the police, is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception. Similar to United States v. Chadwick (1977), the luggage was the subject of police suspicion before being placed in the vehicle.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that absent exigency, the warrantless search of personal luggage merely because it was located in an automobile lawfully stopped by the police, is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception. Similar to United States v. Chadwick (1977), the luggage was the subject of police suspicion before being placed in the vehicle. Sanders resolved two distinct lines of cases: on the one hand, Carroll v. United States (1925) laid down the automobile exception which allowed for warrantless searches of automobiles; on the other hand, Chadwick did not allow for a warrantless search of luggage. Sanders declined to extend the automobile exception here, again stressing, as in Chadwick, the heightened expectation of privacy in one's luggage. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 19346081 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2944 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 895894693 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-02-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1979 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Arkansas v. Sanders, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Burger (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1979 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Blackmun (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Arkansas v. Sanders (en)
dbp:holding
  • Absent exigency, the warrantless search of personal luggage merely because it was located in an automobile lawfully stopped by the police is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Rehnquist (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Arkansas v. Sanders (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Powell (en)
dbp:overruled
  • California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 753 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 442 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that absent exigency, the warrantless search of personal luggage merely because it was located in an automobile lawfully stopped by the police, is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception. Similar to United States v. Chadwick (1977), the luggage was the subject of police suspicion before being placed in the vehicle. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Arkansas v. Sanders (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Arkansas v. Sanders (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License