| dbo:abstract
|
- American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382 (1950), is a 5-to-1 ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Taft–Hartley Act's imposition of an anti-communist oath on labor union leaders does not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, is not an ex post facto law or bill of attainder in violation of Article One, Section 10 of the United States Constitution, and is not a "test oath" in violation of Article Six of the Constitution. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 52167 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedatea
|
- 0001-10-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:arguedateb
| |
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- American Communications Ass'n v. Douds, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:concurrence/dissent
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-05-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- American Communications Association, C. I. O., et al. v. Charles T. Douds, Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- Taft–Hartley Act's anti-communist oath does not violate the First Amendment, Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution, or Article VI of the Constitution. (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Reed, Burton; Frankfurter (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
|
- National Labor Relations Act; Taft-Hartley Act; U.S. Const. Art. I, Art. VI, amend. I (en)
|
| dbp:litigants
|
- American Communications Association v. Douds (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:notparticipating
|
- Douglas, Clark, and Minton (en)
|
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
|
- On appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 79 F.Supp. 563 (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382 (1950), is a 5-to-1 ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Taft–Hartley Act's imposition of an anti-communist oath on labor union leaders does not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, is not an ex post facto law or bill of attainder in violation of Article One, Section 10 of the United States Constitution, and is not a "test oath" in violation of Article Six of the Constitution. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- American Communications Ass'n v. Douds (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- American Communications Association, C. I. O., et al. v. Charles T. Douds, Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
