The stability-instability paradox is a theory from international relations theory regarding the effect of nuclear weapons and mutually assured destruction. It states that when two countries each have nuclear weapons, the probability of a direct war between them greatly decreases, but the probability of minor, indirect conflicts between them increases.

PropertyValue
dbpprop:abstract
  • The stability-instability paradox is a theory from international relations theory regarding the effect of nuclear weapons and mutually assured destruction. It states that when two countries each have nuclear weapons, the probability of a direct war between them greatly decreases, but the probability of minor, indirect conflicts between them increases. This is because rational actors want to avoid nuclear wars, and thus they neither start major conflicts nor allow minor conflicts to escalate into major conflicts—thus making it safe to engage in minor conflicts. For instance, during the Cold War the United States and the Soviet Union never engaged each other in warfare, but fought proxy wars in Korea, Vietnam, and Afghanistan and spent substantial amounts of money and manpower on gaining relative influence over the third world. Thus, nuclear weapons have the potential to cause both stability and instability.
rdfs:comment
  • The stability-instability paradox is a theory from international relations theory regarding the effect of nuclear weapons and mutually assured destruction. It states that when two countries each have nuclear weapons, the probability of a direct war between them greatly decreases, but the probability of minor, indirect conflicts between them increases.
rdfs:label
  • Stability-instability paradox
skos:subject
foaf:page
is dbpprop:columnsListProperty of