Opponents of the war have long claimed that the attack on Afghanistan was illegal under international law, constituted unjustified aggression and would lead to the deaths of many civilians through the bombing campaign and by preventing humanitarian aid workers from bringing food into the country. The number of Afghan casualties reportedly exceeded 5,000 people by January 2002, according to an article on BBC.

PropertyValue
dbpprop:abstract
  • Opponents of the war have long claimed that the attack on Afghanistan was illegal under international law, constituted unjustified aggression and would lead to the deaths of many civilians through the bombing campaign and by preventing humanitarian aid workers from bringing food into the country. The number of Afghan casualties reportedly exceeded 5,000 people by January 2002, according to an article on BBC. More broadly, the invasion of Afghanistan appeared to opponents to be a stepping stone to the 2003 Iraq War, increasing the geo-political reach of the United States.
dbpprop:reference
rdfs:comment
  • Opponents of the war have long claimed that the attack on Afghanistan was illegal under international law, constituted unjustified aggression and would lead to the deaths of many civilians through the bombing campaign and by preventing humanitarian aid workers from bringing food into the country. The number of Afghan casualties reportedly exceeded 5,000 people by January 2002, according to an article on BBC.
rdfs:label
  • Opposition to the War in Afghanistan (2001–present)
skos:subject
foaf:page
is dbpprop:columnsListProperty of
is dbpprop:redirect of