The historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles, the primary source for the Apostolic Age, is a major issue for biblical scholars and historians of Early Christianity. Conservative scholars view the book of Acts as being extremely accurate and corroborated by archaeology, while skeptics view the work as being inaccurate and in conflict with the Pauline epistles.

PropertyValue
dbpedia-owl:thumbnail
dbpprop:abstract
  • The historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles, the primary source for the Apostolic Age, is a major issue for biblical scholars and historians of Early Christianity. Conservative scholars view the book of Acts as being extremely accurate and corroborated by archaeology, while skeptics view the work as being inaccurate and in conflict with the Pauline epistles. Acts portrays Paul as more inline with Jewish Christianity, while the Pauline epistles record more conflict, such as the Incident at Antioch. See also Paul of Tarsus and Judaism.
dbpprop:bibleverseNbProperty
  • 12:25
  • Acts
dbpprop:reference
dbpprop:relatedInstance
dbpprop:wikiPageUsesTemplate
rdfs:comment
  • The historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles, the primary source for the Apostolic Age, is a major issue for biblical scholars and historians of Early Christianity. Conservative scholars view the book of Acts as being extremely accurate and corroborated by archaeology, while skeptics view the work as being inaccurate and in conflict with the Pauline epistles.
rdfs:label
  • Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles
skos:subject
foaf:depiction
foaf:page
is dbpprop:redirect of