Both languages are fairly successful, but Interlingua has enjoyed greater diffusion and acceptance by public and private institutions. Interlingua is taught in many high schools and universities, for example. Ido is what is called schematic (easier to learn for speakers of very different languages), whereas Interlingua is what is called naturalistic (easier to understand for speakers of related languages).

PropertyValue
dbpprop:abstract
  • Both languages are fairly successful, but Interlingua has enjoyed greater diffusion and acceptance by public and private institutions. Interlingua is taught in many high schools and universities, for example. Ido is what is called schematic (easier to learn for speakers of very different languages), whereas Interlingua is what is called naturalistic (easier to understand for speakers of related languages).
  • W interlingwie rodzajnikiem nieokreślonym dla wszystkich rodzajów jest un, w ido nie ma takowego, a używa się słowa un w znaczeniu "jeden", "pewien". W obu językach rodzajnik określony nie zależy od liczby i rodzaju. W interlingwie jest to le, w ido - la dla liczby pojedynczej, le dla mnogiej.
rdfs:comment
  • Both languages are fairly successful, but Interlingua has enjoyed greater diffusion and acceptance by public and private institutions. Interlingua is taught in many high schools and universities, for example. Ido is what is called schematic (easier to learn for speakers of very different languages), whereas Interlingua is what is called naturalistic (easier to understand for speakers of related languages).
  • W interlingwie rodzajnikiem nieokreślonym dla wszystkich rodzajów jest un, w ido nie ma takowego, a używa się słowa un w znaczeniu "jeden", "pewien". W obu językach rodzajnik określony nie zależy od liczby i rodzaju. W interlingwie jest to le, w ido - la dla liczby pojedynczej, le dla mnogiej.
rdfs:label
  • Comparison between Ido and Interlingua
  • Interlingua a ido
skos:subject
foaf:page
is dbpprop:redirect of