Carlen v Drury (1812) 35 ER 61 is a UK partnership law case, which is often cited for a broader principle in UK company law that the court generally does not allow litigation by members where a procedure for redress is set out in the articles of association.

PropertyValue
dbo:abstract
  • Carlen v Drury (1812) 35 ER 61 is a UK partnership law case, which is often cited for a broader principle in UK company law that the court generally does not allow litigation by members where a procedure for redress is set out in the articles of association.
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 28129368 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 636669551 (xsd:integer)
dbp:citations
  • 35 (xsd:integer)
dbp:court
  • Court of Chancery
dbp:dateDecided
  • 1812-12-24 (xsd:date)
dbp:hasPhotoCollection
dbp:judges
  • Lord Eldon LC, Sir Samuel Romilly
dbp:keywords
dbp:name
  • Carlen v Drury
dct:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Carlen v Drury (1812) 35 ER 61 is a UK partnership law case, which is often cited for a broader principle in UK company law that the court generally does not allow litigation by members where a procedure for redress is set out in the articles of association.
rdfs:label
  • Carlen v Drury
owl:sameAs
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is foaf:primaryTopic of