Barrett v. United States, 169 U.S. 218 (1898), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that South Carolina had never effectively been subdivided into separate judicial districts. Therefore, it was held, a criminal defendant allegedly tried in one district for a crime committed in the other had in fact been permissibly been tried in a separate division of a single district.

PropertyValue
dbpedia-owl:argueDate
  • January 21
dbpedia-owl:decideDate
  • February 21
dbpprop:abstract
  • Barrett v. United States, 169 U.S. 218 (1898), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that South Carolina had never effectively been subdivided into separate judicial districts. Therefore, it was held, a criminal defendant allegedly tried in one district for a crime committed in the other had in fact been permissibly been tried in a separate division of a single district.
dbpprop:arguedate
  • January 21
dbpprop:argueyear
  • 1898 (xsd:integer)
dbpprop:concurrence
  • none
dbpprop:decidedate
  • February 21
dbpprop:decideyear
  • 1898 (xsd:integer)
dbpprop:dissent
  • none
dbpprop:fullname
  • Barrett v. United States
dbpprop:holding
  • South Carolina had not been divided into separate federal judicial districts.
dbpprop:joinmajority
dbpprop:lawsapplied
dbpprop:litigants
  • Barrett v. United States
dbpprop:majority
dbpprop:prior
  • United States v. Barrett et al., 65 F. 62 (C.C.D.S.C. 1894)
dbpprop:reference
dbpprop:scotus
  • 1898–1902
dbpprop:subsequent
  • none
dbpprop:uspage
  • 218 (xsd:integer)
dbpprop:usvol
  • 169 (xsd:integer)
dbpprop:wikiPageUsesTemplate
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Barrett v. United States, 169 U.S. 218 (1898), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that South Carolina had never effectively been subdivided into separate judicial districts. Therefore, it was held, a criminal defendant allegedly tried in one district for a crime committed in the other had in fact been permissibly been tried in a separate division of a single district.
rdfs:label
  • Barrett v. United States
skos:subject
foaf:name
  • Barrett v. United States
foaf:page
is dbpprop:redirect of