About: West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FWest_Coast_Hotel_Co._v._Parrish

West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of minimum wage legislation enacted by the State of Washington, overturning an earlier decision in Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923). The decision is usually regarded as having ended the Lochner era, a period in American legal history during which the Supreme Court tended to invalidate legislation aimed at regulating business.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
rdfs:comment
  • West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of minimum wage legislation enacted by the State of Washington, overturning an earlier decision in Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923). The decision is usually regarded as having ended the Lochner era, a period in American legal history during which the Supreme Court tended to invalidate legislation aimed at regulating business.
sameAs
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
foaf:name
  • West Coast Hotel Company v. Elsie Parrish, et ux.
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
prov:wasDerivedFrom
has abstract
  • West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of minimum wage legislation enacted by the State of Washington, overturning an earlier decision in Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923). The decision is usually regarded as having ended the Lochner era, a period in American legal history during which the Supreme Court tended to invalidate legislation aimed at regulating business.
ArgueYear
case
  • West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379
DecideDate
  • --03-29
DecideYear
Dissent
  • Sutherland
findlaw
Holding
  • Washington's minimum wage law for women was a valid regulation of the right to contract freely because of the state's special interest in protecting their health and ability to support themselves. Supreme Court of Washington affirmed.
JoinDissent
  • Van Devanter, McReynolds, Butler
JoinMajority
  • Brandeis, Stone, Roberts, Cardozo
justia
LawsApplied
  • U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Minimum Wages for Women Act, 1913 Wash. Laws 174
Litigants
  • West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
Prior
  • 17280.0
SCOTUS
Subsequent
  • None
USPage
USVol
citation
majority
  • Hughes
ArgueDateA
  • --12-16
ArgueDateB
Overturned previous case
  • Adkins v. Children's Hospital
http://purl.org/voc/vrank#hasRank
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git39 as of Aug 09 2019


Alternative Linked Data Documents: PivotViewer | iSPARQL | ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata      About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3235 as of Jun 25 2020, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2020 OpenLink Software