United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 (1919), is a United States antitrust law case in which the United States Supreme Court noted that a company has the power to decide with whom to do business. Per the , a company may unilaterally terminate business with any other company without triggering a violation of the antitrust laws.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - United States v. Colgate & Co. (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 (1919), is a United States antitrust law case in which the United States Supreme Court noted that a company has the power to decide with whom to do business. Per the , a company may unilaterally terminate business with any other company without triggering a violation of the antitrust laws. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- United States v. Colgate & Co. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
LawsApplied
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| - Demurrer sustained, 253 F. 522 . (en)
|
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - United States v. Colgate & Co., (en)
|
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - United States v. Colgate & Co. (en)
|
Holding
| - Colgate did not violate the Sherman Act when it cut off agreements with retailers. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - United States v. Colgate & Co. (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 (1919), is a United States antitrust law case in which the United States Supreme Court noted that a company has the power to decide with whom to do business. Per the , a company may unilaterally terminate business with any other company without triggering a violation of the antitrust laws. This case created an exception to vertical price restraints in vertical agreements. According to the ruling, resale price maintenance is generally illegal per se, but if a supplier merely says it will not deal with resellers that charge less than the supplier's stipulated price, the supplier need not deal with such a retailer. This is a narrow exception, as companies are still prohibited from threatening or warning price-cutters. (en)
|
cornell
| |
googlescholar
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |