• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Thomas of Woodstock (play)     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatPlaysInManuscript, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingyago:WikicatShakespeareanHistoriesyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Attribute100024264yago:Communication100033020yago:DramaticComposition107007684yago:History115121406yago:Past115120823yago:Play107007945yago:Writing106362953yago:WrittenCommunication106349220yago:Time100028270yago:WikicatEnglishRenaissancePlaysyago:WikicatPlaysAboutEnglishRoyaltyyago:WikicatPlaysInManuscript New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Thomas of Woodstock and Richard the Second Part One are two names for an untitled, anonymous and apparently incomplete manuscript of an Elizabethan play depicting events in the reign of King Richard II. Attributions of the play to William Shakespeare have been nearly universally rejected, and it does not appear in major editions of the Shakespeare apocrypha. The play has been often cited as a possible influence on Shakespeare's Richard II, as well as Henry IV, Parts 1 and 2, but new dating of the text brings that relationship into question.