National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling 8–0 (Marshall did not participate in the decision) that although states have broad power to regulate economic activities, they cannot prohibit peaceful advocacy of a politically motivated boycott.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling 8–0 (Marshall did not participate in the decision) that although states have broad power to regulate economic activities, they cannot prohibit peaceful advocacy of a politically motivated boycott. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (en)
|
foaf:depiction
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
thumbnail
| |
JoinMajority
| - Burger, Brennan, White, Blackmun, Powell, O'Connor (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (en)
|
Holding
| - The nonviolent elements of a boycott are entitled to the protection of the First Amendment. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling 8–0 (Marshall did not participate in the decision) that although states have broad power to regulate economic activities, they cannot prohibit peaceful advocacy of a politically motivated boycott. (en)
|
Concurrence
| |