• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Konstantin Ramul     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatPsychologists, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingfoaf:Personpersondul:NaturalPersonEukaryoteHomo sapiensHumanAnimalanimaleukaryotespeciesschema:Personyago:WikicatPeopleFromKuressaareyago:CausalAgent100007347yago:LivingThing100004258yago:Object100002684yago:Organism100004475yago:Person100007846yago:PhysicalEntity100001930yago:Psychologist110488865yago:YagoLegalActoryago:YagoLegalActorGeoyago:Scientist110560637yago:Whole100003553yago:WikicatEstonianPsychologistsyago:WikicatEstonianScientistsyago:WikicatPeopleFromTheGovernorateOfLivoniayago:WikicatPsychologists New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Konstantin Ramul (30 May 1879 – 11 February 1975) was an Estonian professor of psychology and longtime chair of psychology at the University of Tartu. He is best known for his work on the history of experimental psychology. Ramul believed that history is dependent upon psychology, though the philosopher of science Ernest Nagel criticized him for "not stat[ing] clearly the type of psychological investigation which is relevant to the historian's task" (Nagel 1934, pp. 599–600).