About: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FFriedrichs_v._California_Teachers_Association

Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), is a United States labor law case that came before the Supreme Court of the United States. At issue in the case was whether Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977) should be overruled, with public-sector "agency shop" arrangements invalidated under the First Amendment, and whether it violates the First Amendment to require that public employees affirmatively object to subsidizing nonchargeable speech by public-sector unions, rather than requiring employees to consent affirmatively to subsidizing such speech. Specifically, the case concerned public sector collective bargaining by the California Teachers Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association (en)
rdfs:comment	Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), is a United States labor law case that came before the Supreme Court of the United States. At issue in the case was whether Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977) should be overruled, with public-sector "agency shop" arrangements invalidated under the First Amendment, and whether it violates the First Amendment to require that public employees affirmatively object to subsidizing nonchargeable speech by public-sector unions, rather than requiring employees to consent affirmatively to subsidizing such speech. Specifically, the case concerned public sector collective bargaining by the California Teachers Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Rebecca Friedrichs, et al., Petitioners v. California Teachers Association, et al. (en)
dcterms:subject	2016 in United States case law Tie votes of the United States Supreme Court United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court United States labor case law United States public employment case law National Education Association Education in California United States Free Speech Clause case law
Wikipage page ID	49070568 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1100035805 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	2016 in United States case law Tie votes of the United States Supreme Court Precedent List of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First Amendment Bradley Foundation Detroit List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court United States labor case law Republican National Convention Antonin Scalia United States public employment case law California Teachers Association National Education Association Center for Individual Rights Agency shop Matthew Abood Education in California United States Free Speech Clause case law First Amendment to the United States Constitution Fox News Janus v. AFSCME L. Ed. 2d Laura Ingraham Supreme Court of the United States Collective bargaining National Education Association Orange County, CA Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination Union shop United States labor law Per curiam Ninth Circuit
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-915_1bn2.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2015/14-915_e2p3.pdf https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/578/14-915/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-915
sameAs	Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association
Subsequent	Rehearing denied (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Portal_bar dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Ussc dbt:US1stAmendment
docket	14 (xsd:integer)
OpinionAnnouncement	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-915_1bn2.pdf
OralArgument	https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2015/14-915_e2p3.pdf
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-915
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
USPage	___ (en)
USVol	578 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-01-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2016 (xsd:integer)
case	Friedrichs v. California Teachers Ass'n, (en)
DecideDate	0001-03-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2016 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Rebecca Friedrichs, et al., Petitioners v. California Teachers Association, et al. (en)
Holding	The judgment was affirmed by an equally-divided court. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/578/14-915/
Litigants	Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association (en)
other source	Supreme Court (en)
other url	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-915_1bn2.pdf
has abstract	Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), is a United States labor law case that came before the Supreme Court of the United States. At issue in the case was whether Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977) should be overruled, with public-sector "agency shop" arrangements invalidated under the First Amendment, and whether it violates the First Amendment to require that public employees affirmatively object to subsidizing nonchargeable speech by public-sector unions, rather than requiring employees to consent affirmatively to subsidizing such speech. Specifically, the case concerned public sector collective bargaining by the California Teachers Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association. Justice Antonin Scalia died shortly after the case was argued in front of the Supreme Court, leaving only eight members to decide the case. In the end, the result was a non-precedential per curiam opinion affirming the lower-court decision by an equally-divided Supreme Court. On June 28, 2016, the rehearing petition submitted by the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) was denied, letting the Ninth Circuit's decision stand as its final judgment. In 2017, after regaining a ninth Justice, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a substantially similar case, Janus v. AFSCME. (en)
PerCuriam	yes (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Friedrichs_v._California_Teachers_Association?oldid=1100035805&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	9884 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Friedrichs_v._California_Teachers_Association
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Friedrichs v CTA Friedrich (surname) Friedrichs v. California Teachers Ass'n Friedrichs v. CTA Friedrichs v. California Teachers Assn. Friedrichs v California Teachers Association Rebecca Friedrichs
is Wikipage redirect of	Friedrichs v CTA

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 49 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software