About: Dickerson v. United States   Goto Sponge  NotDistinct  Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRehnquistCourt, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FDickerson_v._United_States

Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000), upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona (1966).

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Dickerson v. United States
rdfs:comment
  • Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000), upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
sameAs
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
foaf:name
  • Charles Thomas Dickerson, Petitioner v. United States
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
prov:wasDerivedFrom
has abstract
  • Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000), upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The Court noted that neither party in the case advocated on behalf of the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 3501, the specific statute at issue in the case. Accordingly, it invited Paul Cassell, a former law clerk to Antonin Scalia and Warren E. Burger, to argue that perspective. Cassell was then a professor at the University of Utah law school; he was later appointed to, and subsequently resigned from, a federal district court judgeship in that state.
ArgueDate
  • --04-19
ArgueYear
case
  • Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428
DecideDate
  • --06-26
DecideYear
Dissent
  • Scalia
findlaw
Holding
  • The mandate of Miranda v. Arizona that a criminal suspect be advised of certain constitutional rights governs the admissibility at trial of the suspect's statements, not the requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 3501 that such statements simply be voluntarily given.
JoinDissent
  • Thomas
JoinMajority
  • Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
  • Dickerson v. United States
other source
  • LII
other url
SCOTUS
USPage
USVol
majority
  • Rehnquist
http://purl.org/voc/vrank#hasRank
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git21 as of Mar 09 2019


Alternative Linked Data Documents: iSPARQL | ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata      About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3230 as of Apr 1 2019, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2019 OpenLink Software