• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Van Orden v. Perry     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:SpeechAct107160883, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: ThingcaseLegal Caseunit of workLegal caseyago:WikicatTenCommandmentsyago:WikicatUnitedStatesLawsuitsyago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesyago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRehnquistCourtyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Case107308889yago:Command107168131yago:Commandment107169848yago:DueProcess101181475yago:Event100029378yago:GroupAction101080366yago:Happening107283608yago:Lawsuit101182654yago:Proceeding101184814yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntitySupreme Court of the United States caseyago:SpeechAct107160883 New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court case involving whether a display of the Ten Commandments on a monument given to the government at the Texas State Capitol in Austin violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.