@prefix foaf:	<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
@prefix wikipedia-en:	<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/> .
@prefix dbr:	<http://dbpedia.org/resource/> .
wikipedia-en:Good_Chap_Theory	foaf:primaryTopic	dbr:Good_Chap_Theory .
@prefix owl:	<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
dbr:Good_Chap_Theory	owl:sameAs	dbr:Good_Chap_Theory .
@prefix rdfs:	<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
dbr:Good_Chap_Theory	rdfs:label	"Good Chap Theory"@en .
@prefix dct:	<http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix dbc:	<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:> .
dbr:Good_Chap_Theory	dct:subject	dbc:Government_of_the_United_Kingdom ,
		dbc:British_political_phrases ,
		dbc:Political_theories ,
		dbc:Political_scandals_in_the_United_Kingdom ,
		dbc:British_constitutional_laws_concerning_Ireland .
@prefix prov:	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
dbr:Good_Chap_Theory	prov:wasDerivedFrom	<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Chap_Theory?oldid=1309926143&ns=0> ;
	foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Good_Chap_Theory .
@prefix dbp:	<http://dbpedia.org/property/> .
@prefix dbt:	<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:> .
dbr:Good_Chap_Theory	dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Short_description ,
		dbt:Reflist ,
		dbt:Blockquote ;
	dbp:text	"The nature of its constitution tells you a great deal about a country, its society and the way ruling power is calibrated and constrained within it. A key characteristic of the British constitution is the degree to which the good governance of the United Kingdom  has relied on the self-restraint of those who carry it out. Unlike nearly every other democracy in the world, we lack a \u2018written\u2019 or \u2018codified\u2019 constitution. The UK has, therefore, no single text setting out the core principles, institutions and procedures of the system, protected from casual alteration by amendment procedures, and enforceable by the judiciary.4 Instead, in the UK, we have trusted politicians to behave themselves. We have long assumed that those who rise to high office will be \u2018good chaps\u2019, knowing what the unwritten rules are and wanting to adhere to them, even if doing so might frustrate the attainment of their policy objectives, party political goals, or personal ambitions \u2013 the argument being that \u2018good chaps\u2019  know where the undrawn lines lie and come nowhere near to crossing them: hence \u2018the good chap theory of government.\u2019"@en ;
	dbp:source	"Blick, Andrew, and Peter Hennessy. \"Good Chaps No More.\" Safeguarding the Constitution in Stressful Times : 5-6."@en .