@prefix owl:	<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Craig%27s_theorem>	owl:sameAs	<http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/guid.9202a8c04000641f80000000047234cc> .
@prefix foaf:	<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Craig%27s_theorem>	foaf:page	<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig%27s_theorem> .
@prefix rdfs:	<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Craig%27s_theorem>	rdfs:label	"Craig's theorem"@en .
@prefix dbpprop:	<http://dbpedia.org/property/> .
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Craig%27s_theorem>	dbpprop:abstract	"In mathematical logic, Craig's theorem states that any recursively enumerable set of well-formed formulas of a first-order language is (primitively) recursively axiomatizable. Distinguish this result from the more well-known Craig interpolation theorem. Proof. Let &lt;math&gt;A_1,A_2,\\dots&lt;/math&gt; be an enumeration of the axioms of a recursively enumerable set T of first-order formulas. Construct another set T* consisting of &lt;math&gt;\\underbrace{A_i\\land\\dots\\land A_i}_i&lt;/math&gt; for each positive integer i. Clearly the deductive closures of T* and T are equivalent. A decision procedure for T* lends itself according to the following informal reasoning. Each member of T* is either &lt;math&gt;A_1&lt;/math&gt; or of the form &lt;math&gt;\\underbrace{B_j\\land\\dots\\land B_j}_j. &lt;/math&gt; Since each formula has finite length, it is checkable whether or not it is &lt;math&gt;A_1&lt;/math&gt; or of the said form. If it is of the said form and consists of j conjuncts, it is in T* if it is the expression &lt;math&gt;A_j&lt;/math&gt;; otherwise it is not in T*. Again, it is checkable whether it is in fact &lt;math&gt;A_n&lt;/math&gt; by going through the enumeration of the axioms of T and then checking symbol-for-symbol whether the expressions are identical."@en ;
	rdfs:comment	"In mathematical logic, Craig's theorem states that any recursively enumerable set of well-formed formulas of a first-order language is (primitively) recursively axiomatizable. Distinguish this result from the more well-known Craig interpolation theorem. Proof. Let &lt;math&gt;A_1,A_2,\\dots&lt;/math&gt; be an enumeration of the axioms of a recursively enumerable set T of first-order formulas."@en .
@prefix skos:	<http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix ns5:	<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:> .
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Craig%27s_theorem>	skos:subject	ns5:Recursion_theory ,
		ns5:Mathematical_theorems ,
		ns5:Mathematical_logic ;
	dbpprop:hasPhotoCollection	<http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/flickrwrappr/photos/Craig%27s_theorem> .
@prefix dbpedia:	<http://dbpedia.org/resource/> .
dbpedia:Craig_theorem	dbpprop:redirect	<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Craig%27s_theorem> .